in court(TM)
against Microsoft!(TM)
25.8.2003
7.9.2001
10.5.1999
Caldera (http://www.caldera.com)
und andere Firmen - und nicht zuletzt das US-Handelsministerium! -
prozessieren seit Jahren gegen Microsoft wegen Microsofts illegaler
Geschäftspraktiken.
Caldera hat auf seiner Website Unterlagen zu den Geschäftspraktiken von Microsoft. Weil der Server von Caldera immer wieder "unten" ist, haben wir uns entschlossen, eine Reihe von Dateien als Mirror bereitzustellen.
Calderas "FACTSTAT.HTM"
7.9.2001
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:54:40 -0700
Sender: The DOJ press release mailing list
<PRESSLIST@JUSTICE.hdcdojnet.state.ca.us>
STATEMENT ON MICROSOFT ANTITRUST LAWSUIT BY CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL
LOCKYER AND NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL ELIOT SPITZER
The following statement was issued by Attorney General Bill Lockyer of
California and Attorney General Eliot Spitzer of New York regarding the
antitrust lawsuit against Microsoft:
On June 28th of this year, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals
unanimously held that Microsoft engaged in unlawful monopolization. The
injury to the public from Microsoft's unlawful acts is on-going, and, as a
result, there is an urgent need for the courts to order relief that protects
the public.
The decision by the states involved in the Microsoft case and by the U.S.
Department of Justice not to pursue a break-up of Microsoft as a remedy is
intended to enable the courts promptly to put into place strong and effective
relief that will promote competition and consumer choice in the marketplace.
The dynamic quality of the computer industry necessarily means that part of
the remedy must be forward-looking. Therefore, the states of New York and
California will insist that Windows XP * Microsoft's latest version of its
personal computer operating system scheduled for marketplace release in the
next few weeks * receive close scrutiny in arriving at a judicially ordered
remedy. As the U.S. Court of Appeals found, some of the ways that Microsoft
unlawfully crushed competition from Netscape included bundling Microsoft's
Internet browser to its Windows operating system, and pressuring industry
computer makers into refraining from adding Netscape's browser to the
computers that they sold. It is imperative that Microsoft not have another
opportunity to use Windows XP to suppress competition in emerging Internet
areas.
The states are committed to pressing the trial court for stringent remedies
that will change the conduct by Microsoft that the courts have found to be
illegal, and that will provide consumers with the benefits of competition. We
look forward to continuing to work with the Department of Justice in the
proceedings that are about to begin before the trial court, but will, if
necessary to protect the public, press for remedies that go beyond those
requested by the Department of Justice.
TINA